What does the tragedy that is Haiti’s earthquake have to do with great power politics or status. Well, thanks to the Wall Street Journal’s chart below (h/t UNRR) we can see how the world’s major actors have responded to the crisis:

The United States has committed by far the most humanitarian aid (163 million and counting) and one can bet that a sizable portion of the $106 million private individuals/organizations also hail from the States. France, which has a long history with the island nation, and the UK were also large donors. China ‘chipped’ in $4.4 million and India about $5 million. Not quite as impressive. The United States also took the lead in providing security and order for the disaster’s aftermath, though this was not done without some controversy. It should be duly noted that Haiti is clearly in the United States’ realm of responsibility and it is in the American interest to ensure Haiti does not devolve into further chaos, but if such a crisis occurred say in Southeast Asia, well like the 2004 tsunami, would aid from the US be overshadowed by closer powers? Would China, India, Japan, etc. stand up and take care of business? Well, this was not the case then and the great powers reactions to Haiti show no real change. The US may be declining in some ways, but it clearly is still the ‘indispensable nation’ and world leader in times of crisis. Just ask the people of Haiti.

Tags: ,

This entry was posted on Monday, January 25th, 2010 at 1:59 pm and is filed under China, France, India, United Kingdom, United States. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 comments so far

Lear
 1 

The European Union on Monday (01/18/2010) pledged nearly $200 million in short-term aid to help Haiti recover from the earthquake and is earmarking almost $300 million in longer-term assistance. Individual European countries have also pledged more than $100 million.

http://www1.voanews.com/english/news/disaster/Europe-Pledges-More-Than-500-Million-in-Haiti-Quake-Relief-81964857.html

January 25th, 2010 at 7:04 pm
Sven Ortmann
 2 

The reasoning is not sound. How is it indispensable?

The U.S. blocked the airport of Port-au-Prince for foreign aircraft, limiting thus their ability to contribute.
Is any evidence available that if Martians beamed to U.S. onto Mars the other power would not have filled the gap in Haiti? I ask because that’s necessary for being “indispensable”.

The whole Haiti thing is furthermore a poor example because it’s such a small affair that offers strong advantages to regional responders.

And just as the other commenter already mentioned; the EU’s response isn’t that small at all.

January 27th, 2010 at 4:21 am
 3 

I agree this is a small affair in world politics and therefore not a clear indicator of one nation’s ‘indispensability’. I also acknowledged the tremendous amount of aid given by certain European countries. But your comment regarding the airport security does not seem fair. Though I have only read small bits of this evolving story, it seems to me that this is a case where the US, as the only superpower here, was either damned if they do or damned if they don’t. If the US chose to let the UN or any other state to take over necessary security of the crucial transportation hub to the devastated island, while….it would actually need a UN or any other state to do so. What other international entity had the desire and more importantly the ability to provide such a public good? And yes, if the US did not exist, the people of Haiti would have still been helped by many other nations, but I don’t think it’s too far a leap to assume that their citizens are okay with the US being around. In fact, in this small case, I think most Haitians would argue that the US is indeed ‘indispensable’.

January 27th, 2010 at 10:57 am
Sven Ortmann
 4 

Haitians might as well think that they would be MUCH better off if there had never been the U.S..

It’s a bit late here, so I won’t tell the whole tale, so let’s just use a link that gives a hint about the problem:

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.com/my_weblog/2010/01/misreading-history.html

January 27th, 2010 at 3:21 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment