Since it is the season of giving, I’ve got some super exciting, extremely provocative, and amazingly fascinating great power stories for you to check out. I mean we got….sanctions, Hugo Chavez, Polish missiles, Rudolf the Red-nosed Reindeer, an Islamic Reformation, and cyberwarfare in Iraq. One of those was just a tease. Another present? GPP’s 4th Great Power Rankings will be out this weekend. Print it out, wrap it, and give it to your loved ones.

Sanctions and Strategy - This is a provocative (I told you that would be here) analysis of the use of economic and political sanctions in modern international politics by George Friedman at Stratfor. Friedman, a staunch IR realist, is more than a little skeptical about sanctions usefulness in actually changing a state’s behavior. Friedman’s conclusion concludes that sanctions are just a way of buying time and passing the buck:

The ultimate virtue of sanctions is that they provide a platform between acquiescence and war. The effectiveness of that platform is not nearly as important as the fact that it provides a buffer against charges of inaction and demands for further action.

Sanctions satisfy the need to appear to be acting while avoiding the risks of action.

Hugo’s Russian Missiles - About a week ago, Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez stated his country had received thousands of Russian-made missiles and rocket launchers as part of his government’s military preparations for a possible armed conflict with neighboring Colombia. Chavez claimed: “They {Colombia} are preparing a war against us. Preparing is one of the best ways to neutralize it.” In recent years, Hugo’s regime in Venezuela has grown closer and closer to Moscow and it has been reported that Venezuela has bought more than $4 billion worth of Russian arms since 2005, ‘including 24 Sukhoi fighter jets, dozens of attack helicopters and 100,000 Kalashnikov assault rifles. In September, Russia opened a $2.2 billion line of credit for Venezuela to purchase more weapons.’

A more distressing issue though is Chavez’s military build up on Venezuela’s border with Colombia and released reports that his government is aiding and abetting FARC members. The US should make it loud and clear that any overt aggressiveness by Chavez would be met with a strong rebuke, mainly with international pressure and military assistance to Colombia. However, I doubt anything serious will occur.

Cyberwarfare in Iraq and Beyond - Shane Harris of The National Journal has written a fascinating (told ya!) article about the recent past and present of US cyberwarfare tactics and defense. Harris asserts that President Bush authorized a cyberattack on cell phones and computers used by Iraqi insurgents to plan roadside bombings in May 2007. Anonymous officials reported that the Americans were able to deceive their adversaries with false information and led them into the fire of waiting U.S. soldiers. Well, I’m impressed and think this needs to be a tactic that the US military continues to exploit. Harris credits former Director of National Intelligence, Mike McConnell and Gen. David Petraeus for bringing cyber threats to the table under the Bush administration. Gen. Former President Bush formed the Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative (CNCI), which President Obama is attempting to enhance and grow. In regards to our beloved great power politics, Harris quotes Kevin Coleman, a senior fellow with security firm Technolytics, who asserts that there is basically a three way tie between China, Russia and the U.S in terms of cyberwarfare capability. The whole articles a must-read.

Poland’s American Missiles - A Status of Forces Agreement has been reached between Poland and the US, which calls for American troops to install and operate a mobile, land-based set of short- and medium-range missiles to defend against incoming attacks. In other words, after scrapping the major Czech-Poland-American missile defense plan, the Obama administration has put in place a similar program, but on a much smaller, disconnected scale. Russia, of course, is concerned about this recent development. Though I was against the cancellation of the earlier plan, I applaud the Obama administration for a rather quick strategic re-engagement with a trusted ally, Poland.

Special Relationship, Not So Special - I’ve discussed this at least twice before so I don’t need to get into too much here, but the Obama administration has continued to distance itself from the British Isles. I think this is wrong for many reasons and hope the administration changes course soon.

Islamic Reformation, Not Looking Too Likely Anytime Soon - New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman wrote an exciting (ok, that one was forced) op-ed calling for internal changes within the Islamic community. Here’s an example of what Friedman sees as wrong or failing in parts of the Islamic world and with reactions to it in the US:

(Referencing the recent terrorist bombings in Baghdad) Not only was there no meaningful condemnation emerging from the Muslim world — which was primarily focused on resisting Switzerland’s ban on new mosque minarets — there was barely a peep coming out of Washington. President Obama expressed no public outrage. It is time he did.

Friedman is right, there really is very little the United States can do to get to the heart of Islamic violent extremist dilemma. Their neighbors, family, countrymen need to stand up and say ‘this type of behavior is wrong and does us much more harm than good’. In referencing Friedman’s article, I found an even better one on the subject by Tom Bevan.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 16th, 2009 at 10:07 pm and is filed under Latin America, Middle East, NATO, Russia, United Kingdom, United States. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

12 comments so far

micraig
 1 

And where was the analysis on Rudolph?

December 16th, 2009 at 10:35 pm
Lear
 2 

The most decisive Great Power game right now is played in Copenhagen.

Chimerica Against the World - Spiegel /Germany
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,667626,00.html

To be more precise: The Great power responibilities are tested.

It seems that the two largest CO2 emitting countries are blocking crucial global decisions.

The US is starting to develop a record on denying responsibilities and is becoming more and more a security threat to mankind.

It looks like the US slowly taking over the position of blockheads once held by the Soviets during the Cold War.

December 17th, 2009 at 7:55 am
 3 

Well, you’re description of the situation sure makes the actor you’re critiquing, the United States I believe, to be quite powerful. Apparently much more powerful than any other actor. Why can’t the EU or any other actor force, cajole, or convince the US to act in a way they deem appropriate?

December 17th, 2009 at 9:38 am
micraig
 4 

Because the EU is as powerless as Lear is prejudiced against the US. Your subtlety and irony will be lost on him Pat.

December 17th, 2009 at 12:17 pm
Lear
 5 

Without the European countries AND the EU their would not even a debate about the pressing issues of climate control.

Without the pressure from European powers at the G8 in Heiligendamm G.W.Bush would have never even thought about agreeing that actions are needed.

The power of setting these agendas and bringing the US to deliver plans is actually the most evident proof of diplomatical power in this case eminating from Germany.

I can´t remember India, China, Brazil or Turkey (LOL) setting the pace or agendas
during the last 2 decades.

With all due respect Mr. Frost, your subtle amused comment just makes clear that your
own standards set in your introduction are not followed when it comes to analyze global
developments. That is not a surprise, because the focus here captures rather minor security issues.

I should be the one who is amused about this foolish concept of Great power actions. But I´m not, I´m rather shocked.

I´m still shocked because the author claims to be an academic teaching IR in a first world country but tends assess the world like an armchair patriot with knowledge mainly deriving from FOX TV.

December 17th, 2009 at 3:56 pm
micraig
 6 

Which shows that you know nothing of Fox news. (Which is, by the way, not news at all but a thinly veiled attempt to indoctrinate people into ultra-conservatism) And the author doesn’t claim to be an IR academic, he is one. You, Mr. Lear, are so blinded by your own rhetoric and prejudices that you don’t see where Mr. Frost veers away from those conservative polemics. Rather than being a neo-con he is, from all appearances, an IR realist. Your biggest complaint with this blog is that you can get no one to agree with your assessment that the EU is a super power. I will suggest it again, go write your own blog and see how much readership you get.

Further, the US doesn’t need Germany to encourage debate in our country. That debate is raging on. America is a complex country that listens to all sides on all issues. Occasionally the country doesn’t go in the direction that I agree with, and occasionally I am frustrated by a system that seems to bog down in minutiae. It is however a wonderful system that, however imperfect, encourages freedom, and as far as I’m concerned, superior to most if not all others. But of course you wouldn’t understand that.

And finally, your earlier analysis that “The US is starting to develop a record on denying responsibilities and is becoming more and more a security threat to mankind,” is so flawed that it is laughable. Security threats to mankind involve much much more than global warming; they involve the myriad of issues that face humanity, militarily, economically, and socially. Your statement is also supremely insulting, but I suspect that is what you intended. As I said before, if the EU is so wonderful, then protect yourselves …………….. if you can.

December 17th, 2009 at 8:51 pm
 7 

Give me a break, Lear. I have probably seen a total of 2 hours of Fox News in my life. Of course I’m sure this is 2 hours more than you have, which if true, means you’re criticizing me about something you really know nothing about. You heard that Fox News is rightwing, American ignorance garbage and probably just believed it because it fit your already held views.

So this blog only emphasizes military issues, eh. Not true. In the post up above alone, I discuss the Special Relationship between US/UK, Islamic internal changes/ or the lack thereof, sanctions in IR. The importance of economics, ideology, human rights, etc. in IR is clear and GPP has showcased this often.

December 19th, 2009 at 5:00 pm
micraig
 8 

Don’t confuse him with facts Pat, Lear lives in his own special dream world.

December 19th, 2009 at 7:54 pm
Lear
 9 

Europe’s rising global role
by JOSE MANUEL BARROSO (President EU Comission)

http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/94038/europe%E2%80%99s-rising-global-role-by-jose-manuel-barroso-.html

Quote:
The world faces traditional and non-traditional security fears. Many of our countries are targets of terrorism, which eight years on from Sept. 11, 2001, we must recognize is down, but by no means out. There are fragile states to contend with as well as the dangers of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, authoritarian regimes, and the threat of extremism. Globalization has also thrown up non-traditional security challenges with no respect for national frontiers. Global pandemics can spread faster; a lack of secure and sustainable energy could push us into a world-wide recession; and climate change, beyond its environmental consequences, could have serious geopolitical and social repercussions.

At least my dream world is shared by the European political elites and the most progressive thinking international media, haha….

December 20th, 2009 at 6:04 am
micraig
 10 

It’s actually a pretty nice quote by Barroso regarding both traditional and non-tratitional security fears and some of the factors facing nations. He seems very thoughtful. However, that doesn’t mean that the “European political elites” share your view of the world. Nor does the quote make the EU a super power. Nor would I classify you as one of the political elites. What it does do is establish that the president of the EU does recognize the world as it is. It also intimates that the EU might, at some point, play a greater role in the general world politic. One can hope.

But I seriously doubt that any of them subscribe to your view of the US as the wolrd’s villain and a threat to humanity, nor to your plea that China isn’t a major power.

I don’t think that you understand my position on the EU which is one of great hope for its future, but tempered with the reality that it just isn’t there yet in terms of being a super power. (other than in an economic sense and even that might be a stretch)

December 20th, 2009 at 1:52 pm
Lear
 11 

On a list of 10 influential global powers the EU has a well referenced natural place.

Like in the G8, as a premier forum for the world´s most powerful, the EU already had a seat for several decades.

The EU does not only (maybe) exert power in the future, it does now and it is doing so globally.

@m: You might like to start to underline your stance with references. Otherwise somebody could be inclined to review your lines as simply a single opinion without a base (which I´m doing since right from the beginning).

I also can´t follow the accusation of MY plea for China not being a classic global “Great power”. It is an assessment from a credible Australian editor, its argumentation is simple and logic.

@m: Right now your only purpose here seems to be acting as a Doberman for Mr. Frost. Lots of Njet, njet, njet barking without citing any substance.

December 20th, 2009 at 7:12 pm
micraig
 12 

Your quotes, often taken from less than credible sources, give no more credence to your positions than no quotes at all; particularly because you use then to foster your position without answering legitimate questions regarding the EU. When you express your opinion regarding the top 10 you have no sources so my opinions are just as plausible and well thought out as any other opinion. As for being Mr. Frost’s Doberman, I think not. He and I have many philosophical differences which you have seemed not to notice. Not surprising because you are a one note political apologizer sounding the horn for the EU. (A horn that no one else seems to find convincing.) Until you can answer the legitimate questions and criticisms that have been put forward with regard to the EU you will gain no support.

December 20th, 2009 at 9:04 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment